Islam, Past, Present & Future: Summary

Expectations were high for this talk. Personally, I had been looking forward to this talk for over a month. As soon as I got to Philadelphia I had heard about it. To say that expectations were met would be an understatement. If you weren’t able to go I will try to put up a summary of what was talked about at the talk.

First, it was a real please just to see Dr. Jackson again. Him as well as Kareem and Amir al-Islam, made it a nice reunion. Sherman Jackson has a lot of love here in Philly. There was an almost audible buzz around the masjid all this week. The people here really trust him – and believe me, they trust very few here in Philadelphia (which isn’t necessarily a bad thing, either, in some cases). I met Dr. Jackson on my way to the United Muslim Masjid, on 15th and Catharine that evening. He came by to see Luqman Ahmad, the imam there. Jackson and Ahmad go way back from what I understand. Imam Luqman said that they even roomed together for a bit. After the salah (prayer) Jackson gave a small talk, saving the best for Saturday.

The talk was held at the Law School, up at U-Penn, Dr. Jackson’s alma mater. The turnout was fairly good, from my numbers. Imam Luqman started the talk by talking about some of the history of Islam in Philadelphia and how it came there. How it has moved through all of the Islamic movements in America from the Moorish Science Temple, the Ahmadiyyah Movement, The Nation of Islam, the Salafiy movement and others. He also stated that despite all these “fads” as he called them, there has always remained a core or group of people that may try these clothes on to see how they fit but go back to their own way. This is becoming more prevalent in that the indigenous Muslims here, mainly Blackamericans, are establishing their own religious authority – their own autonomy.

As for any one who has been following this growth, knows that this is a crucial time. It is absolutely essential that the indigenous Muslims here (across all of America, actually but we’ll touch on why Philadelphia’s so crucial to what happens elsewhere) create their own religious authority.

After Luqman’s introduction, Dr. Khalid Blankenship talked about the history of Islam in Philadelphia as well. He pointed out that although there has been great and necessary scholarship about the fact that many slaves that were brought to the Americas were Muslim, they left no legacy. And that it wasn’t until later years, far after those initial Muslims came, that Islam started to show itself on American soil.

He pointed out there there were several different movements, among the most significant were the Ahmadiyyah’s and also the Free Masons. He lists the Free Masons because of their influence on the people who would be the creators of the first proto-Islamic movements, as Dr. Jackson calls them. That Noble Drew Ali was once a Free Mason and was influenced by their use of Islamic symbolism and other things taken from Islam. He gave a very concise and thorough talk.

Finally Dr. Jackson spoke last. He talked about the need for not just, but in this case, specifically, Blackamerican Muslims needed to find what he termed, “alternate modalities of Blackness, American-ness, manhood and Muslim-ness”, meaning that we as Blackamericans need to burry the hatched on this concept of African-Americans and find a way to embrace our American selves. We need to be able say, “I’m Black and I’m an American.” He spoke of the hyper-masculinity in our Blackamerican culture – most prevalent in Black urban settings. This characteristic, this hyper-masculinity is in fact an offshoot or symptom of a vanquished people. We are compensating in our manhood by lashing out wildly. He says these are typical symptoms of a vanquished people and in order to move forward we must confront these issues. An example he pointed out is that a young Black child may go to school and get all C’s or some B’s and C’s. When asked about this the child will reply, “I ain’t tryin’ to get no A’s.” The reason being is that scholastic and academic achievement are seem as cultural and ethnic apostasy. This is a major barrier for a people that are sorely in need of education.

Dr. Jackson’s counter example, in our example in the Prophet Muhammad for Muslims, is that the Prophet was never considered to be a “punk”. Neither by his companions or his enemies. That compromise is not lacking in manhood. The Prophet had to sacrifice many things in order establish Islam as a bona fide Arabian religion. I say Arabian because at the time before the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah, it was not so. Prior to this treaty it was seen in the eyes of many or most Arabs, as Islam was not a majority religion at this point, to be committing ethnic and culture apostasy to become a Muslim. But when the Prophet signed that treaty doing away with some particulars (the treaty stating ‘In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful’ – the Quraysh, the tribe that controlled Makkah at that time, said, ‘We know no ar-Rahman, no ar-Raheem [The Gracious, The Merciful] – they said say, “In the name of your Lord” instead. Some saw this as a huge compromise but the Prophet said okay to this. The Prophet said he was the Messenger of God – the Quraysh replied, “Messenger of God? No…, if we thought you were the Messenger of God, we wouldn’t be fighting you! Say, Muhammad the son of abd-Allah instead. The Prophet agreed, they were allowed to make hajj the following year and more importantly the numbers of the Muslims grew almost exponentially because it was okay to be an Arab and a Muslim at this point. There was no longer any cultural taboo associated with being Muslim) some saw it as giving too much. The Prophet saw the long term gain as well as that since he was so secure in his being, in his manhood, that there was nothing long with compromise if the gain was worth it.

Finally, he too spoke of the need for a real American establishment of religious authority. Some one giving a fatwah (a non-binding religious ruling/edict) from a country 5,000 miles away, based on their place and time was inappropriate for Blackamerican Muslims, and American Muslims on a broader sense. Blackamerican Muslims must come to terms with their history. They must operate as a people who know their history, where they come from so that they can begin to truly deal with the ills that plague and torture our people.

I plan to take some more time in the future and try to expound upon this a little further but this will at least give you an idea of what was talked about. Leave some comments or questions if you like.

7 Replies to “Islam, Past, Present & Future: Summary”

  1. Salaamz Brother
    Your photographs are quite lovely, but how is it that people of your capacity from this coutry fail so miserably at correct adab. Should you leave an impression that UMM invited an hosted such an important event. Your senior is the oldest male member of the oldest masjid, International Muslim Brotherhod, which hosted the event, invited the guests and put together the project sharing quite liberally with their brothers. Reading this article, I would be completely unaware that Sheikh Anwar Muhaimin’s community had anything to do with it. You also left out the female scholar who was very well received. Her inclusion was a statement of the participants practice and belief about the role and position of women in the religion and the commitment to interfaith dialogue by the presence of the Archdiocese and the Philadelphia Interfaith Center. Blogging has to do with your impressions but it should represent the truth of the circumstances that you witness as well. Inhallah, you will see fit to represent the event in a light that respects the work effort that the Sheikh and his community exerted. Waallahu Alim!

  2. If I were to speak on the capacity of people from their “country” in terms of their adab, I would spell country correctly, first of all. Second, you are attacking myself, insinuating that I am lacking in adab, or manners, so that the people who don’t speak arabic here understand. It is you who have no manners, and in my opinion, are cowardly, by leaving an anonymous post, without your name and email. But, as I’m sure you’d say, ma sha’ Allah. Also, I would not want to start a dialog on the adab of foreigners over indigenous – as there is no viable conversation!

    First, I would like to state that I meant no disrespect towards shaykh Anwar. I just met him this Saturday as a matter of fact. He impressed me as a very kind and learned man. He is a luminary in our community and I look forward to possibly working with him.

    Second, I did not mean to slight IM Brotherhood. I never stated that they had nothing to do with it. And if you read my closing statement, I said, “I plan to take some more time in the future and try to expound upon this a little further but this will at least give you an idea of what was talked about.” Please read that part that says, “but this will at least give you an idea of what was talked about”. I will go back and refine what was talked about, make it more concise and include the sister, Dr. Constance “Jamilah” Carter.

    Your response is the typical knee-jerk reaction that shows you have not studied how to critique someone with adab. Your response highlights the reasons why communities are fractured over small things. I’m sure that if shaykh Anwar were to read this post, he’d be able to see it was an attempt to put down into words a whole lot of information. I doubt he’d take it as a slight. And if he were insulted the man would correct me privately, not publicly (second, a man of Anwars stature doesn’t have the time or lack of sense to get caught up in petty fights or people’s attempts to criticize so that they can have some sense of glory). But, ma sha’ Allah, we have Muslims like you.

    I hope you at least come back to see the second post, take a look at what was written and then perhaps you’ll rip that apart as well. Wa jazaka Allahu khayran.

  3. I would like to further add that the reason I did not include anything on sister Jamilah is because I was hypoglycemic towards the end of Dr. Blankenship’s talk and left to deal with that (it’s a medial condition). So, in doing so, I missed the majority of the sister’s talk. So in line with your ignorant statement about speaking truthfully, I did. Because without having heard her talk, which I will do so soon as I am being delivered a CD of the talk, I could not speak authoritatively on what she said. But, this “oversight” will be corrected shortly. It is ridiculous that I should have to come and defend myself like this but when you insinuate that I am slandering shaykh Anwar, deposing his institution and saying that UMM put this together (which I never said) and excluding sister Jamilah because I’m some male chauvinist, Salafi pig who believes women have no place in the public discourse, yeah, I’m gonna get upset and defend my name. I will point out that I have spoken with two people from the United Muslim Brotherhood who had nothing but praise for my post. We talked and agreed that a more concise synopsis is needed and they are delivering me the CD this week. When you don’t know all the facts, it’s best to keep your mouth shut as you create fitnah. This is what fitnah is: when you say something that affects people. This will be on my mind now while I’m trying to pray. We really don’t need ignorant people in out community. It’d be better if you stay at home.

  4. When you blog be man enough to take criticism. Be strong enough to critique your own language deficits and spelling and grammar deficits, recognize your implications by excluding a host who was kind enough to treat you with respect and inclusion based on the pictures and words that you posted. Always thank the host. That is not just foreign manners, it is American, black folk, white folk, any folk manners. You know who-mashallah, alhamdulillah allahu akbar yes-Yusra

  5. You obviously don’t have enough things to keep you occupied in your life. I just got off the phone with the folks from the IM Brotherhood who thanked me for coming to the event and photographing it for them. You need to stop speakin’ out the side of your neck, who ever you are. What I wrote was meant to be a rough draft, it was a rough draft and that’s it. Why you’ve taken it to the extent of saying I’m being rude or I’ve done this or that. This is ridiculous. I have it from the horse’s mouth that IM Brotherhood was happy with what I’ve done. So consider that, my fellow Muslim. Just consider that. This has nothing to do with manhood and everything to do with what’s wrong with Muslims today. People taking things out of context. Speaking on matters they have no real knowledge of and no authority to speak on. You are a classic case in this. Perhaps some good will come out of it that some other Muslims will come here, read these few comments and see why it’s important to just keep your damned mouth shut on certain matters. I have done nothing wrong, insulted no one and that’s from the IM Brotherhood. Case closed and court adjourned!

  6. Pingback: Sherman Jackson » Annual Islam In America Lecture Series
  7. Pingback: The Manrilla Blog » Annual Islam In America Lecture Series

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.