As Benjamin Missbach describes in his article, Mental Imagery and Food Consumption, human beings have an enigmatic, Proust-like capacity to,
“travel back and forth in time by using mental simulations. By imagining shapes, forms, and scenes, humans can relive the past and visualize future events”1.
The process of reimagining the past, as demonstrated in the above image on the back of a delivery truck, is emblematic of how the food industry operates in the western, developed world. Unlike Marcel Proust’s madeleine, however, whose triggered memory was based on an actual memory, our nostalgic reactions today to such images as the one above — a white cowboy rancher, is based more on fiction and fantasy than fact and reality.
There are numerous prophetic traditions surrounding imagery; some negative, others positive. Two such narrations are,
صَنَعْتُ طَعَامًا فَدَعَوْتُ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَجَاءَ فَدَخَلَ فَرَأَى سِتْرًا فِيهِ تَصَاوِيرُ فَخَرَجَ وَقَالَ إِنَّ الْمَلاَئِكَةَ لاَ تَدْخُلُ بَيْتًا فِيهِ تَصَاوِيرُ
‘Ali stated, “I made some food and invited the Prophet ﷺ to come and eat. He came and entered, then he saw a curtain on which there were images, so he went out and said, ‘The Angels do not enter a house in which there are images’.” — Sunan an-Nasa’i 5351
as well as the hadith narrated by the Prophet’s wife, A’ishah,
عَنْ عَائِشَةَ أَنَّ جِبْرِيلَ جَاءَ بِصُورَتِهَا فِي خِرْقَةِ حَرِيرٍ خَضْرَاءَ إِلَى النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَقَالَ إِنَّ هَذِهِ زَوْجَتُكَ فِي الدُّنْيَا وَالآخِرَةِ
According to ‘Aishah, Jibril (the angel Gabriel) came to the Prophet ﷺ with her image upon a piece of green silk cloth and he said: “This is your wife in the world, and in the Hereafter”. — al-Tirmidhi #3880
These two statements may appear contradictory though it should be noted that the latter is graded as “strange-but-fair” (
Professor of psychology, Hobart Mowrer (1907 – 1982), writing about food and behavior, concluded,
“behavior is determined by conditioned emotional responses to images, reflecting prospective gains and losses, that ‘guide and control behavior in a generally sensible, adaptive manner’3“4.
There is something about the image, which so effortlessly penetrates our ration decision making process. It is perhaps because so much research has relied on an almost exclusively rationalist approach to the study of how we make decisions, that it has not only missed the mark in providing a critique against the ubiquitous use of imagery in our society, but has altogether failed to bring our attention to the problem as a whole. While there may be no means of solving the image problem, like many challenges in life, perhaps by bringing awareness to the issue we can however combat its effects.
Recent research, to quote Missbach again, tells us,
“marketing practices are not just a creative idea put forth by marketing managers but are supported by concrete evidence for the link between mental simulations and behavior“5.
But the point of this article here is not simply to say that images affect our eating habits (which they most assuredly do), but rather that images also manipulate our perceptions on reality, in this case: “what is food and what does it mean to us?” Carolyn Steel aptly sums up this manipulation in her book, Hungry City,
“Meanwhile, the countryside we like to imagine just beyond our urban borders is a carefully sustained fantasy. For centuries, city-dwellers have seen nature through a one-way telescope,
What Steel is telling us is that we’ve been duped, to a large extent, on what’s going on with our food systems and how we imagine our food is being produced. It’s not all green pastures and cute little animals. It’s massive industrial farms where not only animals are raised and slaughtered with cruelty but also the humans who are called upon to work as little more than cogs in a brutal machine. Far too often the human element is also ignored in this as well, with all of the attention going to animal rights.
But what is to be done here? Surely the solution is not the banning of images. Not only would this be impractical, if not impossible in a non-Muslim society, in
وَظَلَّلنا عَلَيكُمُ الغَمامَ وَأَنزَلنا عَلَيكُمُ المَنَّ وَالسَّلوىٰ ۖ كُلوا مِن طَيِّباتِ ما رَزَقناكُم
“And We shaded you with clouds and sent down manna and quails to you: ‘Eat of the good things We have provided for you‘.” — Qur’an 2: 57
1. Missbach, Benjamin, et al. “Mental Imagery and Food Consumption.” Frontiers in Psychiatry, vol. 6, 2015.
3. Slovic, Paul, et al. “Imagery, Affect, and Decision Making.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 1998.
4. Mowrer, Orval Hobart. Learning Theory and
5. Missbach, “Mental Imagery and Food Consumption.”
6. Steel, Carolyn. Hungry City. Vintage Digital, 2013.